Journal 7
the quickest way of ending a war is to lose it
the quickest way of ending a war is to lose it
When two countries are encountering a war with each other
without using an ultimate weapon that can wipe out the whole country, such as
the nuclear bomb, the war will eventually turn into a seesaw battle that both
sides need constantly put into human and material resources into the
battlefield. A country without an overwhelming power difference can rarely determinate
or conquer another within a relatively short period. Due to the limits of
transportation, both sides can only exert limited influence on the battlefield which
is not enough to establish an absolute advantage over another. Thus, the war
will become a quagmire for both sides: to win is to invest, but to end is to
lose. However, this constant effort to keep the “not lose” will not bring the
victory or the price of victory will outweigh the prize of the victory. As a
result, lose the war to end the war would be reasonable and worthy. There is a
similar economic term related to this phenomenon -sunken cost. Sunken cost
refers to the cost paid and can not be refunded; in war, the sunken cost will
refer to the resource already distributed into the war. Sometimes it is better
to give up those sunken costs, which will save future costs.
Nice use of seesaw as a metaphor. Great analysis!
ReplyDelete